I recently read an article that  said actress Emma Stone was criticized because of her hair in the movie ''The Help.''   Emma Stone's character fashioned tight, ringlet curls. The article quoted from another online magazine:  “Emma Stone’s wig in ‘The Help’ had her looking as if she had her hand in an electrical socket, not in the rewriting of history.”

I want to know why, seemingly, in any industry that has public attention (music, acting, fashion, modelling), naturally curly hair is forbidden.

Seriously.

I have been exploring the internet trying to find ''celebrities'' (even though that word - and the connotations that follow with that word - annoy me) with frizzy locks, but I can't seen to find any females, and even then, men are kinda limited too.

If a celeb is seen with curly/wavy hair, it is usually been styled to perfection with product and curling irons, and no frizz in sight.

But why? Is it seen unattractive, immature, childlike?

I personally think curls are the most beautiful things ever. I mean, it's hair that forms shapes all by it's self. it just forms as a curl! How awesome!

And if you think about the people you know that have a natural curl/wave in your life, that's a LOT. I know so many. So, there must be celebrities with naturally curly hair, too, right?

Right. So those celebrities have to have their styled to perfection ALL the time just so their hair doesn't look naturally curly/wavy? How utterly nonsensical.

I think it's about time the industry recognizes naturally curly hair as a good thing. I, Lucy Howell, hearby pledge to accept my messy frizz  as a part of who I am. I mean I'm not famous, but even if I was, I would stick by this pledge.  All succumb to the power of frizz! Hurrah! Frizz fantastic, accept your frizz today!